The traditional bidet has a variety of severe UX problems as evidenced by the universal confusion over a number of issues on first use.
The old style european type is designed such that you should be facing the controls. Which is only reasonable when you think about but requires a non-intuitive posture.
There are now electronic ones which integrate with a toilet and provide a control pad.
Don't indulge yourself with a bidet as they can be habit forming.
It does not actually say "full browser support" does it? All I see is "browser support" with an asterisk to indicate her determination is based on most recent builds.
I don't think this is in any way meant as an authoritative reference for browser compatibility.
I think its purpose is that suggested by the title: a practical introduction. A subscript might have been: How to use CSS3 instead of various klduges to achieve interface effects.
In my opinion, anyone using the newer markup and style tools should be testing cross-browser anyway.
By "Full support" I meant that it fully supports the feature (without a prefix or huge deviations from the spec). It doesn't have anything to do with browser versions.
The referenced "studies" show that users will scroll if they realize they need to access their desired content.
Okay.
That absolutely does not mean that vertical pages provide pleasing UX or good usability. It simply means the user endured the vertical layout in that case.
None of the provided citations support that conclusion of the article. Not only that - sample size, obvious confirmation bias, and extreme extrapolation of data to unsupported conclusions render the "studies" relatively useless.
In the last citation, even though they attempt to wash it away with statistical significance (SD on a sample of 15?) their data actually shows that usability, as defined by comprehension, is maximized by paging.
I think the truth is found closer to the notion that form follows function and the answer to scroll vs. paging is content and site specific.
I am finding the article, overall, unimpressive. The method involved seems to be that of looking for support of one's opinion, not extraction of good practice from objective research.
The old style european type is designed such that you should be facing the controls. Which is only reasonable when you think about but requires a non-intuitive posture.
There are now electronic ones which integrate with a toilet and provide a control pad.
Don't indulge yourself with a bidet as they can be habit forming.