Yes, I’m one data point, but use the stock terminal. I installed iTerm at one point but didn’t find enough benefit to justify continuing to do so. I have no doubt those using iTerm enjoy it and are productive, but phrasing it as you do is really unnecessary.
Sorry but I flag this due to your confusing domain. goolge? Seriously?.
Even more hilarious is your faq page:
"FAQ
Q: What’s up with the name?
A: The name is a most likely vain attempt to lure some poor souls from the British Indian Ocean Territory who mistype the name of a well-known search engine into a web of hopefully interesting blog posts."
In terms of ethics, it is not good. Even if you don't try to sell anything, making visitors confused with your domain is not by any means recommended. Who will make sure that he won't and never try to sell anything from now on. I am not arguing on the content, though. Whether it is good or not depends on the reader's assessment. You can't forgive one's evil act just because that act looks cool (to you).
I agree with what you are saying, but making visitors confused needs a bit more than just a misspelled domain name. People have brains... Ok, not all of them (brains) are so well developed, but I refuse to believe that landing on that website will fool anybody. Sometimes we try too much to be "fair" for the sake of being the "good guys" and we don't see things in context. Of course we don't know for sure that he will not try to sell anything or try to fool people that he's actually Google, but I'm only talking about the present. I don't think his act looks cool and I also don't think it's an evil act. And I don't even think his content is that good, but his content definitely doesn't try to fool anybody.
Anyway, because English is not my native language, it's a bit hard for me to explain why I don't think is fair to flag it up.
Don't worry I totally understand your point. Maybe I am a little bit harsh, but I still won't rollback my decision of flagging this. I understand that he doesn't try to fool anyone, but his attention vs what everyone perceives may conflict. I have to admit that on a site like Hackernews, the first time I look at this link at its address, I almost thought that Google is now interested in ICO, had it not been for the 1 minute that I try to look back at the domain and then go to its faq page.
I'm not sure how Google is handling these case now, but I guess you may receive a cease and desist letter and an offer to buy the domain for a few hundred/thousand buck in a friendly way.
Just in case, be sure that your readers know where is your alternative page.
This is nice. I really love this.
However, it is lacking demo for pull requests and I wonder what happen to the tree graph if there are too many branches.
```
Object Not Found
Unable to find blob path 'video/iterative-review.mp4' in revision '1.0'
```
About tree graph for too many branches, please take a look at an example, such as https://dev.gitplex.com/projects/tensorflow/commits. You can see on the left of the commits, there is a tree. I just want to know if we have a lot branches, how the UI handle that :)
Hi, OP and also a long time Linux advocate here. I own a list called Awesome Linux Software and I was constantly searching for great software. That's how I jumped into your app and decided to post it here on HN.
Long time reader of Head First series here. I have finished :
- HF Software Development
- HF Design Pattern
- HF Java
- HF Android Development
I have no complaints. Really, thank you for making those books. They helped me a lot. I think you couldn't have every reader to agree that your book is good because each person has their own taste, but to be fair, yours do a good job in delivering quality content in many aspects under a friendly narrative.
Thank you! I've spent some time on the phone with several of the authors of those books. They did a great job with them.
If you get a chance, go to Amazon.com and leave a five-star review for each of those books. It seems like a small thing, but you'd be surprised about how each additional review with five stars helps, even a one-sentence review. They all definitely deserve it!
Very nice app and promising. However, I would the UI would look more "modern" (don't know if this is possible or not). Right now the button and the scrollbar is a bit outdated. The bonus point for me that this is written in Kotlin, not another Electron RAM killer app.
