It's not a very good umbrella term, the term itself implies a relationship structure where an individual is in multiple, involved intimate relationships. A couple in an open relationship where one or both partners engage in dalliances doesn't fall under that umbrella.

It's posible to draw such clear line? Surely, it's rather easy to convince oneself you have all your relationships nicely compartmentalized..till reality does otherwise.

I imagine it's like an open relationship with more rules around when and how one engages in outside activities.

For some reason, I was expecting the search to filter the results instead of just work like Ctrl+F. It'd be nifty if it could collapse non-matching UUIDs.

The hate wasn't always there. Pent up frustration for the healthcare system precipitated as hate when an obvious target hit the news.

You get frustrated when your doctor is 30 minutes late. Being denied coverage by your insurance for something serious and expensive is a matter that causes hate.

The executive branch only spends the money approved by congress. It only runs the agencies created by Congress. The executive branch can't shrink, can't spend less money, without Congressional approval. With the vanishingly small majority Republicans will have in Congress, this sounds like a pipe dream.

So like ~/.ssh/ is bad? Or does it get grandfathered?

SSH has the argument that they are older than the specification, now cargo, nah, a lot of application that use ssh hardcoded .ssh, cargo don't have that excuse

I thought my comment addresses this specifically.

Yes, it's bad. If you predate the specification then see options 2 (check), 3 (document) or 4 (come up with a new spec for opting in).

I feel like a healthy mix is fine. Just like I wouldn't want my repo to be 90% cache, having 1-2 folders is fine.

Given the query, "baby peacock", doesn't describe something that actually exists, what results is Google expected to return? Actual baby peafowl? Cartoons of peacocks with "baby" proportions? Should they be consistent with the results for a similarly fanciful query like "baby rooster"?

It's like American pastiche

"For example the DOJ doesn’t pursue cases against states like California that maliciously violate constitutional law or SCOTUS rulings."

Do you have specific examples of this?

The ease of typing a character should only matter for artisanal, hand-typed files.

I agree. So if we don't need this hand crafted and for human consumption, we may as well just use some TLV or LV encoding instead of the CSV madness of separators and escaping. CSV is basically designed for hand crafting.

They are also easy to read, perhaps easier than a 'space' or other character. Although this could be because we are just used to seeing data eg CSV in this way