Shaving a few minutes off your shower, walking to the shop instead of driving, turning your thermostat down by a few degrees will make no f@@kin difference what so ever to the horror that is coming.
The whole point of these exercises is not to save energy but to engage the population to believe that they are part of the problem and therefore part of the solution. They are not.
One of the most important videos on the entire Internet, if you cannot understand why then you are probably already lost.
More than likely that the door to door sales aren't employed directly with CF and on commission only so the competition for sales will be fierce. There's another ISP in London that does the same thing I think it might have been Hyperoptic.
I was once called in as a consultant to sit-in on a meeting between Hyperoptic reps and a bunch of building owners they were trying to "sell" to.
It was clear the Hyperoptic guys had a well-rehearsed pitch which was fine tuned to their target audience (i.e. non-techie building management committees).
They had well rehearsed answers to the predictable questions thrown up by building management.
However they struggled with or rather tried to bluff and bluster they way out of technical questions.
For example, when I asked them how they could justify using CAT5e for the "last-mile" (i.e. basement area to residents flats), because for those residents on the upper floors this would easily exceed the CAT5e standards limits. (Their proposal was all their active kit was to be in the basement, so no fibre trunks between switches or anything like that).
So you can appreciate why I'm not a fan of the way these companies tend to operate.
The issue now is that the Middle class stand to lose their houses by the end of the year because over over leveraged and over borrowing. Now that's why it's getting so much (more) attention.
Maybe a small percent will find it advantageous to walk because they're underwater and can fanangle and can financial magic to buy a different house cheaper.
A small percentage might not be able to pay their 2021 payment because of gas prices or job loss.
The biggest risk to prices or banks is likely collateralized commercial investors.
What is the point of a "stable coin" especially when it is say pegged to the dollar. i.e. 1 to 1. It means nothing because why not just use Dollars in the first place. It serves no purpose.... Unless you didn't really have those dollars in the first place? Because otherwise it's just transferring money with extra steps (fraud) in the middle. The only possible justification of having it is that you don't have the dollars in the first place.
I’m not a big crypto fan, but, the purpose it serves is to keep your money in crypto (avoid fees/paperwork when transferring to fiat) but not risk the value due to the volatility of non-stable coins.
https://schoolsweek.co.uk/96m-laptop-contracts-went-to-tory-...
http://www.edugeek.net/forums/hardware/218211-geo-geobook-1e...