Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | LAC-Tech's commentslogin

This discourse feels like you are deliberately pretending not to understand things.

My opinion should be obvious - all religion is illogical and does more harm than good.

Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.

Please don't fulminate...

Eschew flamebait. Avoid generic tangents. Omit internet tropes.

Please don't use Hacker News for political or ideological battle. It tramples curiosity.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html


Africas fertility rate is declining massively as well.

Yes, by 2091 Africas fertility rate should be 2.1

A lot of people would rather live in their own aged society than a slightly younger foreign one.

Emphasis on slightly younger. Fertility is declining basically everywhere. Much of the developing world is now below replacement including India and China.


'A lot of people' usually means the predominately older strata of society. Japan has been having issues with the younger generation being locked out of employment and advancement because of older generations needing to hold onto their career with a death grip and retirement ages going up.

The aged society scam can only persist as long as they can exploit the younger generation. When that collapses, the end result is either going to be leaving the elderly to die or things start collapsing in new and interesting ways

The only reason why people 'prefer' this is for the same reason 'prefer' to believe climate change doesn't exist. Eventually reality catches up.


You've completely missed my point.

Immigration is not a long term solution to an aged society. The societies of target countries are aging as well and not far behind.

What you advocate is to bolster the work force of a country with a fertility rate of ~1 and falling, with people from a place with a fertility rate of ~2 and falling.


Is the average IQ of the US still 100?

Roughly yes, it is declining. The Flynn effect was just smart people having kids later which has now normalized and reversed (with smart people having fewer kids).

isn't the point that 100 is roughly the average? or 100 at the year they made the test, anyway.

Isn't it always 100, by definition?

I dont think IQ is based on american adults.

It's based on whatever population you're testing, IIRC.

Author here.

Yes, that would be the first paper I linked to in the article, "Managing the Development of Large Software Systems" (Royce, 1970).

The first diagram is the classic waterfall diagram, used there for illustrative purposes as an example of what not to do.

Highly recommend it to people - it's short but a real breathe of fresh air. Mostly still applicable today.


Author here.

Well I think this just proves we can slap "agile" onto anything. The people before agile actually wrote things with more substance than the manifesto.

The agile projects you worked on sound wonderful, and I would align "writing specs" with what you describe, at least in terms of the design doc.


Author here.

So one of the main points in this massive, 700 word Treatise (which I do hope you will find the time to read) was that nothing Agile practitioners slapped their label onto was actually novel.

Why re-invent agile, when agile itself was just a reinvention by "the kids" (your words, not mine) of things people in the 1970s already knew?

One might as well go straight to the 1970s directly.


Yeah I read it and didn't get the point. So agile is dead? And we are now doing waterfall due to Ai needing unambiguous specifications? But also agile was nothing new because they knew that waterfall didn't work in the 70s. But now it works? Or are we still doing iterative development but the term agile is banned as unoriginal?

I am not Kent Beck; I don't have all the answers.

All AI has shown us is that we should probably write specs before we code. That was true before AI, but LLMs have just shone a light on this, and it will remain true if agentic coding falls out of fashion again.

Never once did I advocate waterfall...

Read the Royce paper, seriously. It's short, he's a much better writer than I am, and if nothing else it's a fascinating looking at the old state of the art.


Where in Taipei? I have been there a few times, so you can be specific.

I'm not sure if there are better shops, but I've been to Syntrend Creative Park and they have a floor with all kinds of gadgets, including various keyboards. There are mechanical keyboards to try out (IIRC there are for example ducky keyboards), and they are also selling some good keycap sets.

It's worth noting that early on in English, þu/ģe (thou/ye) did not say anything about formality. It was just singular and plural.

If you are interested in Wulf and Eadwacer it is beautifully sung here:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=6-QagSE7sFY


Consider applying for YC's Summer 2026 batch! Applications are open till May 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: