By default, rv will create a library folder in the same folder as your rproject.toml and there's rv activate/deactivate to add it to your loaded libs. Pretty much the same stuff as a virtualenv in Python.
Location: France
Remote: Yes
Willing to relocate: No
Technologies: Python/Rust/TypeScript
Résumé/CV: https://www.linkedin.com/in/vincentprouillet/
Email: hello@vincentprouillet.com
I'm a software engineer with over 15 years of experience. I've been working remotely for the past 10 years, most recently for a YC biotech startup for 5 years (found through HN!) as well as dabbling with AI for a failed startup and some contract work. I've worked across the stack, from purely frontend work to processing jobs in Rust and everything in between. I do quite a bit of open-source projects in Rust: https://github.com/Keats/
Location: France
Remote: Yes
Willing to relocate: No
Technologies: Python/Rust/TypeScript
Résumé/CV: https://www.linkedin.com/in/vincentprouillet/
Email: hello@vincentprouillet.com
I'm a software engineer with over 15 years of experience. I've been working remotely for the past 10 years, most recently for a YC biotech startup for 5 years (found through HN!) as well as dabbling with AI for a failed startup and some contract work.
I've worked across the stack, from purely frontend work to processing jobs in Rust and everything in between.
I do quite a bit of open-source projects in Rust: https://github.com/Keats/
Has anyone very familiar to Elixir tried Gleam? I've been eyeing Elixir for years but I would miss types. Gleam looks nice but you lose Phoenix/Liveview which is 90% of the appeal of Elixir to me.
I've used both and like both. It's pretty smooth to use gleam code from elixir, so you could implement core data handling and business logic in gleam then still just use phoenix for the webapp layer.
But also just try elixir? In a lot of ways it handles like a typed language because of exhaustive pattern match and being able guard/match in function parameters. There's not much practical difference between matching on Some(data) or {:ok, data}. I prefer having types too, but for everything elixir (or erlang for that matter) gives you, it's a manageable compromise.
Anyway elixir is getting a type system right now. I like gleam a lot but I'm not sure it's really aiming to be a universal elixir replacement.
So if you have a concept that doesn't have an equivalent in English you just kinda translate it and add a comment for other people of your language to understand what it is?
Sure. And for a concept that's so foreign there is no English equivalent, I hope there's plenty of documentation. I mean, to each their own, but for me, a software team using native language for variables is a red flag.
Didn't know Linear before, but indeed it looks like a lot is coming from there, even their terminologies (i.e. "Cycles", etc.). Linear does seem to have more integrations, but less issues (250 max.) on their Free tier.
reply