There definitely some hypocrisy, but it might work differently in the law.

As devs, we might claim that 'code is the law' but my guess is that the law does not care. That is, one cannot overwrite property laws by a few lines of code.

Consider how disclaimers work--we are increasingly putting limitations on what rights you can contractually forfeit.

This will be interting to watch.

Well, I thought it was interesting.

I think you articulated the vagueness very well.

One other example I was thinking was product placement. Are these characters eating pizza? Or is it Pizza Hut®™ pizza?

See also: SunnyD, IHOB

Well I am banned from /r/libertarian for wrong think. I didn't know about other subreddits though.

This is a misunderstanding of enshittification. It isn't just 'some product is bad'.

It's offering things for free or cheap to build buy in. Then rug-pulling away the free tier to reap a profit.

Agreed. I think the article does a great job going into exactly that definition.

This was very entertaining. I had a rough idea of the timeline before, but had never thought about it in this way (that is, a ladder).

Perhaps then it becomes 'You have reached your weekly maximum 19.5 hours. Come back next week for more work.'

I do not understand this at all, but it looks cool.

From a comment:

> juvenile and silly. So much wasted time and resources. If you need to take legal action against another company, then do so. But please leave the users out of your shenanigans. It’s unprofessional.

I think I disagree, at least to an extent. They are leveraging an open source tool. They made their business built around that tool.

And as for the innocent users--this is such a small impact to users that I am not to worried.