Wouldn't infinitely spawning web workers do the same thing as a zip bomb?
```
<script>
const workerBlob = new Blob(['
while (true) { console.log("this is a worker that will never stop") }
'], { type: 'application/javascript' })
const workerBlobURL = URL.createObjectURL(workerBlob)
while (true) { new Worker(workerBlobURL) }
ISTM that's just an a priori feeling. The value or lack thereof of the product totally depends on how accurately it predicts human survey responses, which you can't know without looking at the data.
> To further examine the universality of the Five-Factor Model, they examined how the MBTI dimensional raw scores related to the FFM/Big5 scores. They showed that FFM-Extroversion was highly correlated to MBTI-Introversion (r = -.74), FFM-Neuroticism was weakly correlated to MBTI-Introversion (r = .16), FFM-Openness was correlated to MBTI-Intuition (r = .72), and to MBTI-Perception (r = .30), FFM-Agreeableness was correlated to MBTI-Feeling (r = .44), FFM-Contentiousness correlated to MBTI-Perception (r = .49).
Those are honestly pretty high correlations for something like this. High is subjective of course. I feel like the question you want to ask is how well can you predict an MBTI score knowing only someone’s FFM.
Well if a correlation value is .7 (squared to .49) then you would expect to guess correctly about 75% of the time with just the univariate relationship (naively assuming that the underlying distribution is 50/50 to begin with, without which we would need to refer to something like a RoC AUC score…).
Big 5 is accurate but hard to explain. MBTI is fairly easy to explain and honestly it's not like astrology where it is random, an INTP does act very differently than an ENFJ
They’re stuffed with content, but much of the content is of poor quality. The good stuff everyone has seen, and you can attract new viewers with a new show that is good.
They have 30-40 years worth of content. I agree, majority is bad. But there is still plenty of stuff to watch. Plus, rewatching some old great show often is more rewarding than consuming all this new drek.
That old content is not on Netflix, or if it is is quickly disappears for "rights" reasons. Even more so now with every company coming out with its special streaming service.
I have a feeling that they are optimizing for view length (binge watchers) instead of commercial value of views.
If I watch only 3 Netflix movies or 1 serie in a month, I should be getting 10 times more budget per movie / serie than a person viewing 30 Netflix movies / 10 series. Sadly this doesn't happen.
I disagree. Tons of good stuff flew under the radar over the years... I have a huge backlog to work through just flipping through ranked stuff on Reelgood.
I lived in the Arcade in Providence, RI for a year. It was the USA’s first enclosed mall. The second and third floors were converted to tiny apartments.
Waves like this have a clear peak when they stop rising, but before they fall, so there is a natural moment to click the shutter.