Claude Code let's you add/change it's output style.
On the article: the author seems to be overly sensitive to remarks made by an LLM. Instead of looking inward and finding out why that bothered them in the first place and grow, they "fire" the tool.
If you are just looking to massage the numbers so there are more first homes vs second homes percentage-wise without creating new first homes, then taxing luxury second homes may work. It has great potential to change the numbers on a spreadsheet.
Decreasing the number of secondary homes for the wealthy _does not_ create more first homes people can realistically afford though.
This guy fails to communicate properly how others can and should contribute to his project. I see this all the time where the standards of a project aren't properly documented so the reviewer/maintainer just wastes time reviewing the same thing thousands of times until they give up.
This is likely the best answer so far. It would be the same as if they had subcontracted some software factory where many junior devs produced and shipped low quality code that “works”.
The writer of the article confesses to using LLMs to improve their grammar. Writer is then upset Grammarly correctly attributes the recommendation he is getting to someone they know.
A nothing burger essentially.
On the article: the author seems to be overly sensitive to remarks made by an LLM. Instead of looking inward and finding out why that bothered them in the first place and grow, they "fire" the tool.