Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | CITIZENDOT's commentslogin

threejs ?


After getting good at it, there is no "additional" prep time, unlike take homes, where you would need to spend hours for every individual assignment. Is that so hard to understand?


>After getting good at it

Do you know the "use it or loose it" phrase? How long do you stay good at leetocde to not require anymore prep whenever you interview again?

For some people, doing an AI assisted take home might take less time than having to restudy and re-exercise leetcode for months which they won't use again. Plus a lot of people suck at live coding when put on the spot due to anxiety, which means even more time investment for something not related to work.

>Is that so hard to understand?

I understood just fine, I'm calling it out as being incorrect for a lot of people.


Why not? Elaborate


It's quite hazardous to your health to all of a sudden lack any DNA. Your cells won't know how to replicate for one.


I think we prefer effort put in. If it feels like that post is a direct copy paste of LLM, It doesn't feel worthy to be read. If the poster made some effort to make it their own and give it a personality, it's fine I guess.


i don't understand, are you implying i'm marketing something? what do i have to market ;)

i used the term "consume" and "content" because it covers all forms of content, "reading text", "watching videos" under one blanket term.


I am not implying that at all. You are using a marketeer's vocabulary when you write about "content" or "consuming content". That's all.

I am implying that vocabulary choice is indicative of a general lack of thought and consideration. I don't know if you made that choice consciously, but I do think that in general referring to "content" makes the material itself less interesting.


Watching Fall (2022) made me extremely wary of these kind of stunts.


I had dismissed that movie, based on the previews, as just silly B-movie with better production. Is it actually good in the sense that the plot is plausible and the acting is decent?


It's a pretty bad movie with bad acting. I did like it for some of the height shots which can be dizzying (I had no issues with 20-30m indoor climbing walls).


of course, they have to be accounted for before making a bet. but even then, it's possible to get out with profit sometimes.


This is great, I'm going to start learning Morse code because of this.


This article doesn't consider reusing similar components. For example, you want to use the purple button with a shitton of classes at multiple places. You don't always define the classes. Design a component (I know react, so using it's terminology), and use that. It'll be much easier to read/write and maintain that single component.

And article also says tailwind is the safest way to remain a beginner in CSS. I agree with this. But again, tailwind is not for someone who doesn't know CSS. It's not a magic UI framework. You have to know CSS. Tailwind is just a way of writing CSS without stylesheets.


Are you founder of Japan.dev?


Tokiodev.com is on his profile


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: