Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | BMSmnqXAE4yfe1's comments login

Why do we need Uber in the first place? Where I live, there is an app that directly connects drivers to riders who pay cash, and nobody takes 30% fee fro mdriver's wages.


I never have cash on me and I'm not the only one. Thus that service would be useless for me and for everyone I know.

Where I'm from, it's the law that cabs should accept credit and debit, not only does it reduce tax fraud, but it also allow people like me to pay. Transaction fees are not that expensive, but believe me, companies that provide it to cabs drivers, does charge much more for it. Still it's less than 30%.

Again where I'm from, dispatcher does charge the drivers, and from what I read, it was not too far from 30% (which makes sense, they have to account for advertising, wage for dispatch by phone, and since Uber, for the development of a badly made app).


As a driver, collecting money sounds awkward, slow, risky for a dash, and certain to change the dynamic with the passenger.

As a passenger, cash is far less convenient, and paying at the end of a ride is awkward, slow, and certain to change the dynamic with the driver.


I'm sure 99% percent of drivers will choose 30% more money vs "avoiding risky cash". And they have an option of direct money transfer through mobile phone too.


As a passenger, to me cash is far more convenient, as it preserves my privacy and nobody can overcharge me. The bill is usually 20-30% lower than Uber.


Fun fact, everyone I hear speaking out about Amazon taxes and worker conditions, has Amazon Prime membership.


If taxpayer dollars subsidize Amazon, and Amazon then offers things that are very valuable to those same taxpayers, they shouldn't feel guilty about buying them. Those artificially low prices are because of their tax dollars, after all.


That's an excuse, and very weak one. Tax subsidy is a minuscule part of the cost savings.


Uber's cost per ride is exactly zero. So they WILL make more per ride. Of course, there will be fewer rides, as more people will choose car or public transportation. They will probably lose overall.


That site looks like a collection of copy-pasted standard "investment wisdom" articles. The word "petrodollar" used in this particular article strongly suggests a propaganda operation, similar to RT or ZeroHedge.


On the contrary, I found this to be anything but a robo-investment column, and this article was the first time I’d seen a rational explanation of the origin and history of the term “petrodollar”, whereas I had only seen it used as a pejorative in the past.


Because iPhones are cheaper in the US and can be resold for profit/gifted.


The article states that people will pay subscription fees to cooking sites and sports blogs. Not gonna happen.


Still works for me ... they just switched payment model from pay one time and enjoy forever to pay every year. Should have allowed old users to enjoy forever IMO ...


I remember long ago there was a service called Napster, that could distribute pirated songs "peer-to-peer". I wonder if it could be used again instead of the "platforms", because Napster network wasn't owned by anyone and nobody profited from it, so there is nobody to sue here.


Amazing how slow things are moving ... took 50 years for RISC to catch up to CISC, and no other more advanced architecture is on the horizon.


PowerPC was a RISC…


Both algos will crash if the target is not on the list, so both are equally bad :)


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: