Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | AbuAssar's commentslogin

Check the copyright notice at the bottom of the frontage, it says (c) 2026 AMD

nice project, thanks for sharing.

any plans for providing it through brew for easy installation?


There's a very similar afm CLI that can be installed via Homebrew.

https://github.com/scouzi1966/maclocal-api


done

  brew tap Arthur-Ficial/tap
  brew install Arthur-Ficial/tap/apfel

No need for the extra tap step, this works fine alone:

    brew install Arthur-Ficial/tap/apfel

Looks like they just added homebrew tap to the instructions

good idea

Epyc’s naming is beautiful and consistent

Is it possible to train a model on all gimp features that will eventually let us prompt whatever edits we want and it’ll automate gimp to achieve it?


You could do this, GIMP is scriptable which is half the battle - you may not even need to train a model.


Why the downvotes?


not having a led indicator for camera, and not having an ambient light sensor, this means they are using the camera as a light sensor


yeah, I expect they use the camera as a make-shift ambient light-sensor, just with a lower frequency than a illumination sensor would be used (due to power consumption impact), and with overall lower accuracy (lower dynamic range, reduced FoV, very bad accuracy in low-light/bright conditions,...).

This pretty much matches the described experience in the article that Gruber had, as he mentions he had to adjust brightness up and down at least twice every day...


so this is just to say that they will start developing the online version.

I believe with the help of ai tools they can accomplish it in a shorter time.


oxc formatter is still alpha, give it some time


sure, but biome just works today... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯... i don't understand why we need 10 (or even 2) different rust based formatters... people need to just work together a bit more imho.


R1S looks better than R2


it is worth noting that Jujutsu uses Git’s storage, networking, and ecosystem.


It uses it when you use the git backend, but not when you don’t.

Right now, the only other backend is at Google, so it’s not practical for most people. But it’s not an inherent part of jj, and that’s really important, actually.


For anyone that does not work at Google, it sounds like an implementation detail that does not matter.


Yes, at the moment it does not. But a well factored system is important for gaining future benefits. For example, I work at a startup that is building jj related tooling, and that the git stuff is separated out cleanly is what enables us to build better things than if it were so tied to git.

To complete the analogy, given that we haven't launched, yes, this is a theoretical benefit for now. But that doesn't mean it's useless. jj is still pre-1.0 software, there's a lot more work to do, and more interesting things coming down the pipeline. That matters, even if it's not relevant to every potential user just yet.


10 years of using Git and I never knew undo was what I craved. And the ability to rebase and edit commits in a single command.

Solves 90% of my problems so haven't felt like I needed any additional tooling on top of jj.

But I am curious is there some edge case on jj that I missed. That you folks are working on improving tooling for?

Just really curious about this new world with some better solutions to git.

I liked pijul a bunch too but lack of compat with git meant I can't use it for work... Haha real sad moment right there.


Not working on it (yet), but I wish the jj <-> github story was a little more ergonomic.

Additionally, I am really missing support for stacked diffs, ie, easily pushing a number of commits into one PR on github each such that they all show their incremental diff.

ezyang's gh stack was pretty useful, if a little bit fragile [0] and graphite.dev is also very nice, but paid software with a strong VC based motivation to become everyone's everything instead of a nice focused tool.

[0] https://github.com/ezyang/ghstack

I'm also not super happy with the default 3-way merge editor, but often cannot use vscode or other GUIs.


https://github.com/LucioFranco/jj-spr is one way to get stacked diffs on GitHub with jj, but also GitHub has at least claimed on X that native stacked diffs is coming so we'll see how that goes!


Git's plumbing is great. Git's porcelain is what sucks. JJ replaces the porcelain.


Git's plumbing also kinda sucks (in places). Some of the current limitations of jj in what syncing state between repos is due to things missing from git that they are having a hard working around, at least based on what I've seen browsing their tickets. That inability to push the really useful jj state upstream for pulling from any machine seems like a major pain point in jj right now (was one of the major issues referenced in a jujutsu intro guide last year linked on HN)

The same issue hit the initial efforts (that I think were the inspiration for jj) when the mercurial folks, recognising git had kinda taken over the market, experimented in making a mercurial frontend backed by the git db. Limitations like the diff format (mercurial's weave one is one the jj folks also want to add at some point) and the lack of a method for tracking phases (mercurial relies on this for clean history without throwing out commits), and lack of file move/copy tracking.


This comment made me reconsider my attitude about git a little bit. Thank you.


so?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: