Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Yep, and I feel many commenters in this thread are comparing value propositions only in terms of specs. I’ve built a number of Mini-ITX cases, from 5L to 20L, and they are a pain to work with and maintain. In some cases it’s impossible to make a reasonable filtered airflow, so dust builds up very fast, and a teardown to do clean up is pretty annoying. Steam Machine looks very straightforward to maintain. And it’s also tiny and quiet.

Sure but that level of confidence is what would also eventually wipe you out because gamblers are not necessarily known for proper risk management. You could win 10 bets in a row but then it would only take one bet that you had 100% conviction on for you to lose and you get wiped out

Any mainstream consumer product based on LLMs is going to put guardrails around them of some kind. China might give you different guardrails, but it's a bit naive to assume that a Chinese company would impose fewer restrictions overall than an American one.

> I think prediction markets could serve a similar to a futures markets and have a functional purpose in the economy. It could be useful to generate real time estimates of the probability of some events that no one can control and have real economic consequences, like a hurricane.

Even though nobody can control them, some people can predict them better than others. (Meteorologists with good models and supercomputers, etc.) In general it's impossible to prevent the appearance of insider trading in prediction markets, and it's also impossible -- unless you massively restrict what people can bet on -- to prevent people from doing things for bets to resolve in their favor, which turns those "markets" into "bounties." (The same guys who theorized prediction markets were the ones who theorized assassination markets.)

They're fundamentally broken and the fact that they're allowed is a sign and symptom of a dysfunctional society.


the option to use system webview , electron don't provided that

It's amazing that companies still can't handle the concept of somebody moving to a different country but still using a credit card from their original country.

I spent two days on the phone with Microsoft last year trying to find a way to pay them $700 to renew my lapsed Visual Studio subscription. I live in France and want to pay with a US card (or UK card or even a French card at this point), but because of some combination of physical location, store location, account location, card country, and vpn that I had on the first time I tried the process, the system is in a state where it can never again process a payment for me.

There are like 5 or 6 companies where I'm in this state. You get exactly one try to guess the magic combination of all those things above to get the backend to sail you through smoothly. If you blow it, it'll write everything down and refuse to let you change anything, then drop you into an infinite loop telling you to just change [store|country|card country|hairstyle] and sending you back to the beginning.

I mean sure, it's probably saving me a couple grand a year in services that I wish I could get working. But it baffles me that those companies don't want that money for themselves.


All online services are like this. I used to sell stuff on eBay. Had multiple accounts randomly closed. Never did find out why.

They were not pointed at the problem. You're reading the section about corpus selection and mixing it up with the benchmark rules.

And, false positives are reported in the results.


At the end of the day, the only guaranteed way to retain access to LLMs is to run an open model on your own hw. Which at this time, it's often inferior but may change in the future.

Also, I'll never be grateful enough for all the horror stories about Google accounts getting randomly banned - they were what finally pushed me to make a similar move.


I guess you do it anyway? the change in the state of mind is thought to be at least in part the mechanism of action, no? so if thats what makes it work, its good to test it against a non hallucinogen

You forget that after 2 years you still gonna have said Mac Studio that can be sold off for 30-50% of the price.

Of course its gonna lose value faster if something magical happen with hardware manufacturing, but you'll likely get 25% back at least.

On other side you cant really predict how valuable claude max gonna be in a year because Anthropic can further enshittify it.


hey this seems like a cool product!

I'm curious which ones you had trouble with? I switched last week, and have been testing all the games in my library. I'm quite impressed with how all of them just work with zero or little tinkering. The only games I haven't been able to play are the ones with anti cheat that explicitly deny Linux.

> What would take months/years can be done in a day or a week.

Hahahaha, this reads like pure unadulterated marketing. I sincerely hope you're getting paid for these things at least, it would be sad for you to be this way without even getting anything in return.


They're experts. There is no end to efficiency.

* already is.

Copper prices are through the roof, and the usual copper players are seemingly unwilling to expand much

(Atleast in India)


Not everyone lives in a place where electricity is $0.20 a kWh. For instance BC Hydro residential rates are $0.11 (CAD) for the first tier and $0.14 for the second tier of consumption in a month. At current exchange rate $0.14 CAD is $0.099 USD a kWh. Hydro Quebec is even cheaper.

At a theoretical 6 tok/s, 86400 seconds in a day, approx 500,000 tokens of GLM5.2 output for 2 bucks a day seems like a pretty good bargain to me. Of course not counting the one time cost of the hardware to run it. But I see people dropping $4000-5000 on all kinds of much less useful stuff.

Additionally in a place where people use electric baseboard heating or electric in floor radiant heating, or really any other heating element based system in winter that's less efficient than a heat pump, additional electrical from a computing load is basically "free" since you would be spending that same money otherwise to heat your house. If a computer with 512GB of RAM is dumping the waste heat into your room, it accomplishes a portion of the same thing as a baseboard.

Not to mention there is a whole other less measurable benefit of having a locally hosted model that can't be turned off or arbitrarily restricted by a service provider, and where all of your queries and context cache aren't subject to surveillance by any third party.


The memory crunch started October 2025. DDR6 will come out in 2027. At that point you're investing new capacity into an obsolete technology.

If I was a memory company, I would try to bring DDR6 to the market as soon as possible. DDR6 allows high end CPU based server platforms to reach the memory bandwidth of an A100 or half a H100 without the costly HBM.


Not GP, but here is how I know. Messi and Steve Carell did an ad for local chips brand, (market size < 10 million people). There is no way that brand could afford them. Searched online and found the same ad for Lay's. Turns out Pepsi owns a lot of local snack brands. They'll buy local brand and if it's popular they will keep the brand (instead of replacing it with global brand like Lay's). Ad is recorded for all brands at once, they just replace bag of Lay's with bag of whatever is the local chips they own.

My framework is already two decade old prior art and you still haven't actually convinced me that this RFC solves a problem.

Why even call it in that case?

If you guys are hiring, I am interested. My email and personal website are in my profile. Thanks!

In all seriousness, between DeepSeek-V4-Pro, Kimi K2.6 and now K2.7-Code, Xiaomi's MiMo-2.5-Pro, and Qwen3.7 Max, I haven't touched Claude for any sort of programming-related task in months.

I still lean on Claude for research/chat questions that require going out to the world to get the answer competently, but that's just laziness, and all of their competitors can do that, too.

I don't use OpenAI or Gemini, either. The Chinese models are just that good. If all three of the US majors banned me, I think that'd be just fine.


I was driving a tractor since 12, including on the road with small farm equipment, and indeed, mostly out of the necessity, but I also received a lot of tuition (from licenced drivers) to know how to behave.

Different times though.


Business is pretty simple actually: you begin by finding the market, then you proceed with getting a thing to sell on the market, then you sell you thing at the market. Think about it in simple terms: to start a business of selling vegetables – acquire vegetables, find a marketplace nearby, sit there and sell your vegetables. All businesses really are just increasingly sophisticated versions of this; source something of value, reach the customer, make money.

Not necessarily, I mean if you buy a in-game item or currency that wouldn't be a cash advance so with this they could just say you bought $20 worth of credits and since you're buying credits that could be considered a good.

Is this the new “google banned me for no reason”?

Googles customer relations were “AI” before LLMs.


Everything starts from random. Bro! Even Python, Javascript and other started randomly.

I thought the whole point was that it doesn’t need to be pointed at the problem. That’s a much easier problem to solve. Also you eliminate 10000 false positives.

> I can ask the AI simple questions about my field and it's completely wrong 3-4 prompts in.

I'm guessing that field is gaming? It would be interesting to know what those simple questions are and what's wrong the answers if you don't mind sharing.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: