Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> My issue with AI summaries is that they are not even remotely accurate, trustworthy or deterministic.

Who cares if it's deterministic? Google changes their algorithms all the time, you don't know what its devs will come up with next, when they release it, when they deploy it, when the previous cache gets cleared. It doesn't matter.





Haha, I suppose the problem is that LLM outputs are unreliable yet presented as authoritative (disclaimers do little to counteract the boffo confidence with which LLMs bullshit) — not that they are unreliable in unpredictable ways.

Presented as authoritative by its users. I mean there are very obvious disclaimers and people just ignore it.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: