Bingo, great reply! This is what I've been trying to explain to my wife. LLM's u...

AdamN · 2024-10-31T14:56:24 1730386584

Yes but the initial training sets did have thoughts and feeling behind them and those are reflected back to the user in the output (with errors)

Benjammer · 2024-10-31T15:20:33 1730388033

non c'est un pipe

Ability to generate words describing emotions are not the same thing as the LLM having real emotions

Jerrrrrrry · 2024-10-31T16:04:31 1730390671

There are humans that do not experience emotions, they are not un-real pipes.

Featherless biped -> no-true Scotsman goalpost moving [saving us that step]

Humans are no more capable of originality, just more convinced of their illusion of consciousnesses. You could literally not pick a human out of a conversational line-up, so it is moot - computationally functionally equivalent.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_room https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanism_(philosophy)

At some point, their models will 1:1 our neuron count, and Pigeonhole principle then implies we are the "less intelligent ones" since "internal model" (implicit parameter count) is the goalpost of the hour.