Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'd be incredibly surprised if there are even 100 people who:

- Don't know who The Washington Post editorial board would endorse

- Would change who they are voting for based on this lack of endorsement

But I could be wrong.



All elections ultiamtely come down to undecided swing voters. It's silly every-time, but you need to vastly lower your expectations for that kind of crowd. Yes, a cheesy dance number endorsing a candidate can be all that is needed to swing an entire election.

This is an issue with first past the post, but that's a much larger thing to tackle.


We’re in. Situation wheee one of the candidates routinely criticizes us and praises our enemies, and still pulls at about 42%. Rationality is not in evidence.


If this race is right, then whatever I thought about people was wrong.

Then again, I always wonder what the hell actually went through peoples minds in Nazi Germany.


Looks like you’re getting a firsthand view now.


[flagged]


After more than 60 years the Reductio ad Hitlerium is finally losing its power, heartening to see.


The reason is pretty damned simple: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It%27s_the_economy,_stupid Or, as Bertolt Brecht put it, "Erst kommt das Fressen, dann kommt die Moral." The Democrats used to understand this but now they don't and that's why they are struggling.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: