The Renault Zoe EV and Tesla Model 3 have the same price.
The Renault Zoe is very low end compared to a Tesla, what make them cost the same?
An EV includes technology that is very costly and even a middle end car ends up costing like a base offer in a higher segment (because the Zoe EV is the premium offer in their segment)
You can't get any lower than that
A Zoe with an ICE engine costs in fact 10k less.
The same exact car.
There is no equivalent for Tesla, Tesla does not make cars in that segment and even if they could, they won't do it.
Said in other words: a low end Mac costs and has specs of a high end machine
Highly castrated from the manufacturer (only 16GB of RAM tops?) but definitely not low end, not even for Apple
It's their base offer for the high end segment
Which is very different from saying it's a low end machine.
Their aren't low end, they are simply not premium (there isn't going to be a big difference in performances between the two, only a different positioning, equipment and less artificial limitations from the manufacturer)
They are like AMD K6 CPUs that you could overclock using a pencil
The conclusions of this review support the idea that the specs of the Mac mini are not far from what we could expect from the pro models
> In the new Macbook Pro, we expect the M1 to showcase similar, if not identical performance to what we’ve seen on the new Mac mini
The Renault Zoe EV and Tesla Model 3 have the same price.
The Renault Zoe is very low end compared to a Tesla, what make them cost the same?
An EV includes technology that is very costly and even a middle end car ends up costing like a base offer in a higher segment (because the Zoe EV is the premium offer in their segment)
You can't get any lower than that
A Zoe with an ICE engine costs in fact 10k less.
The same exact car.
There is no equivalent for Tesla, Tesla does not make cars in that segment and even if they could, they won't do it.
Said in other words: a low end Mac costs and has specs of a high end machine
Highly castrated from the manufacturer (only 16GB of RAM tops?) but definitely not low end, not even for Apple
It's their base offer for the high end segment
Which is very different from saying it's a low end machine.
Their aren't low end, they are simply not premium (there isn't going to be a big difference in performances between the two, only a different positioning, equipment and less artificial limitations from the manufacturer)
They are like AMD K6 CPUs that you could overclock using a pencil
The conclusions of this review support the idea that the specs of the Mac mini are not far from what we could expect from the pro models
> In the new Macbook Pro, we expect the M1 to showcase similar, if not identical performance to what we’ve seen on the new Mac mini